STP Forex Brokers

If you’re new to forex trading, you might wonder what an STP forex broker is and how it differs from other types. In this article, we’ll cover the basics of STP forex brokers, the benefits and drawbacks of using one, and the fees and costs associated with STP forex trading.

Best STP Forex Broker

What is an STP Forex Broker?

An Straight Through Processing broker (STP broker) is a middleman that forwards your orders directly to hird-party liquidity providers, without manual intervention or dealing desk processing.

This execution model aims to provide a faster, more transparent trading environment than what you get with a market maker dealer-desk broker. Unlike market makers who internalize client trades and take the opposite side, STP brokers connect client orders to external sources (often banks, hedge funds, or other financial institutions) that can fill those orders. The broker earns revenue not from trading against clients, but through either small markups on spreads or commissions per transaction. Some STP brokers charge both spread markup and commission. Exactly which solution that is best will depend on your strategy. Sometimes, paying a commission is justified if it means that the spread mark-ups are significantly smaller.

STP brokers form part of the broader non-dealing desk (NDD) category, a category where you will also find the ECN brokers (Electronic Communication Network brokers). A major difference between STP brokers and ECN broker is that STP brokers will typically not give you access to an aggregated order book or Level II pricing. The key function of STP lies in the automation of the transaction path: the trader places an order, and the broker’s system routes it to one or more liquidity providers who then execute the order at the best available price. The process is quick and, under ideal conditions, bypasses the latency, re-quotes, or slippage that might occur with less sophisticated systems.

Benefits of STP Forex Brokers

Below we will list some of the most essential benefits of using an STP broker compared to a regular forex broker.

No Requotes: One of the biggest advantages of using an STP broker is that there are no requotes. Once you place an order, it will be executed immediately and at the best available price.

Direct Market Access: STP brokers provide traders with direct access to the interbank market, where prices are determined by supply and demand from multiple liquidity providers. This can result in better pricing and faster execution times.

No Dealing Desk: Since STP brokers don’t act as a counterparty to their clients’ trades, no dealing desk is involved. This means the broker and the trader have no conflict of interest.

Transparency: Some STP brokers offer greater transparency by providing an order book showing the market’s depth and the volume of trades taking place. This information can help traders make more informed trading decisions.

Drawbacks of STP Forex Brokers

Wider Spreads: Some STP brokers mark up the spread to earn a profit, which can result in wider spreads than those offered by ECN brokers.

Potential for Slippage: Since STP brokers send client orders directly to liquidity providers, there is a risk of slippage during fast-moving markets. Slippage occurs when the price at which your order is executed differs from the price at which you placed your order.

Limited Transparency: While some STP brokers offer greater transparency by providing an order book, not all brokers do. This can make it difficult to see the depth of the market and the volume of trades taking place.

More Info About STP brokers

Execution Flow

The central idea behind straight-through processing (STP) brokers is efficient order execution without dealer-desk interference. When a trader sends a buy or sell order, the STP broker’s system automatically scans its pool of liquidity providers and sends the order to the one offering the best bid or ask price. The price is then executed directly through that provider, and the position appears in the client’s account in real-time.

Liquidity Access

The liquidity pool for STP brokers varies in size and quality depending on the broker’s relationships with banks, financial institutions, and other market participants.

From a broker’s perspective, the challenge lies in maintaining sufficient relationships with liquidity providers to ensure consistent pricing and execution quality. The more robust their access, the better the experience for the trader. Brokers with weak or unreliable liquidity channels may face order delays, rejected trades, or wider spreads, factors that can undermine the entire STP advantage.

Market Data Information

Unlike ECN brokers, STP platforms usually do not show market depth or the range of available order sizes across price levels. Traders cannot interact with the broader market, only with what’s offered by the liquidity providers connected to the broker. This makes STP execution simpler and more direct, but it also means less transparency in terms of how many orders are sitting at any given level or what the broader market structure looks like.

Spreads and Commissions

STP brokers can offer either variable or fixed spreads, depending on how they structure their pricing model. In a typical STP setup, the broker receives raw pricing from liquidity providers and adds a small markup to the spread before presenting it to the trader. This markup constitutes the broker’s profit. Some STP brokers may combine this with a small per-trade commission, but the majority operate on a spread-only model.

Since the spreads are based on interbank prices, they can vary depending on liquidity and volatility in the underlying market. During high-liquidity periods (such as the London or New York session overlaps) spreads are generally tighter. In contrast, during off-hours or around major news releases, spreads can widen significantly. This variability reflects real market conditions and is a characteristic of all non-dealing desk models, including STP.

Order Types and Trading Flexibility

STP brokers typically support all standard order types, including market orders, limit orders, stop orders, and trailing stops. The execution model allows these orders to be processed rapidly and with minimal slippage under normal market conditions. However, since execution depends on the availability and responsiveness of external liquidity providers, occasional delays or price variations may still occur, especially during periods of low liquidity or market stress.

Traders who employ scalping strategies, automated trading systems, or news trading tactics often appreciate the flexibility STP execution provides. While quite a few market makers (MM/DD brokers) restrict or ban certain high-frequency strategies, STP brokers are generally more permissive, as they pass the trading activity directly to external providers and do not hold client positions on their own books.

Infrastructure

STP brokers rely heavily on technology infrastructure to manage the seamless flow of orders. Many of them integrate with popular trading platforms such as MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), or cTrader. These platforms support automated trading systems, custom indicators, and multiple order types, giving traders control over execution while the backend handles routing.

Low latency, appropriate server location, and data accuracy are essential components of a well-functioning STP system. Some brokers offer virtual private server (VPS) hosting or direct market access tools for clients using algorithmic strategies. While not as advanced as ECN environments in terms of routing options, STP environments can still offer sufficient technical depth for most retail and semi-professional traders.

Broker Incentives

When a MM/DD broker is your counterpart, it creates a situation where your losses are a gain for the broker, and vice versa. This automatically establishes a conflict of interest that must be managed in a responsible way.

Some traders dislike this conflict of interest so much that it alone is enough for them to seek out STP and ECN brokers. STP brokers and ECN brokers benefit when clients trade, and it does not matter if you profit or lose, at least not for each individual trade. (Long-term, a profitable trader will have the ability to continue trading, and will probably also grow their account balance and be able to trade larger volumes, which is beneficial for the STP and ECN brokers).

When a broker´s revenue comes from spread mark-ups and/or commissions, and not from profiting off your losses, it creates an alignment between broker and trader: both parties benefit when trades are executed cleanly and efficiently. There is little incentive for an STP broker to manipulate pricing, hold back orders, or restrict successful strategies. This doesn’t eliminate risk, but it does reduce the structural conflict that exist in the MM/DD model.

With that said, all brokers (MM/DD, STP, and ECN) have an incentive to encourage trading. The MM/DD is profiting from your losses, the STP wants you to trade a lot since that generates more money from spread mark-ups, and the ECN broker is raking in more commissions when you trade a lot.

Some brokers handle this situation in a responsible manner, e.g. by providing high-quality educational material aimed to improve trader success over time, since a successful trader can trade more. Others are more short-sighted and will push marketing campaigns and trading-styles that entice traders to “go big or go home”. Be vigilant if your brokers starts feeling less like a service provider and more like a sales person that just want you to deposit more and engage in high-frequency, high-volume trading with little regard to sane risk-management strategies.

Is an ECN Broker Right For Me and My Trading Strategy?

STP brokers offer a trading environment that balances speed, automation, and simplicity, without the potential conflicts of interest found in market-making models. The structure is built for efficiency: orders are routed directly to liquidity providers without being handled or altered by a dealing desk. This setup benefits traders who need reliable execution but don’t necessarily require raw spreads and institutional-level tools like full market depth or order book transparency. Deciding whether an STP broker is right for you depends heavily on how you trade, what level of precision you need, and how much control you want over your order routing.

Retail Traders Seeking Reliable Execution

For most retail traders, the main appeal of STP brokers lies in straightforward, dependable trade execution. If your strategy depends on market or limit orders being filled quickly without dealing desk interference, the STP model is well-suited. These traders often use STP brokers to reduce re-quotes, slippage, or other manipulations that may occur in environments where brokers internalize trades or trade against their clients. An STP broker doesn’t offer full ECN features, but it removes much of the uncertainty that comes with market makers. This makes it appealing for traders who want something cleaner than a retail broker but don’t need direct access to an interbank network.

Scalping

Scalping is a trading strategy where you make small, frequent trades to profit from tiny price movements. It relies on precise order execution and competitive spreads, and many scalpers use STP or ECN brokers. STP brokers allow scalpers to operate in an environment where orders are quickly routed to external liquidity providers, avoiding the intervention that could slow down or block rapid-fire trading strategies.

While some STP brokers may still impose limitations on very aggressive strategies, most are far more tolerant than market makers. As long as the strategy doesn’t overwhelm the broker’s infrastructure or violate terms of service, it can normally be used without issue.

If you plan on employing this type of strategy, it is important to research the specific brokers you are interested in, to find out more about any limitations or issues.

Automated and Algorithmic Trading

Traders who use expert advisors (EAs), scripts, or other automated systems often find STP brokers a practical middle ground. Orders are routed without human interference, and integration with platforms like MT4 or MT5 means that custom scripts can operate without interruption. Execution speed might not match ECN-grade systems, but for many automated setups, it’s fast enough. What matters here is consistency. STP brokers can offer a predictable environment where algorithmic rules can run with less distortion than in a market-maker model. The absence of artificial re-quotes or delayed fills makes it easier to test and trust the results of an automated system.

A Middle Ground Between Market Makers and ECNs

An STP broker sits between traditional market makers and more advanced ECN models. For many, this balance is exactly what they want: no conflict of interest, decent spreads, reliable fills, and enough platform functionality to execute their strategies. It provides a real-market feel without the (comparatively high) commissions, partial fills, or high capital requirements that can accompany ECN trading.

Compared to ECN trading, STP execution simplifies trading by hiding the complexities of order books, market depth, and counterparty interaction. For traders who don’t need to see the inner workings of the market but still want transparency and fair pricing, STP brokers remove unnecessary complexity. This also benefits newer traders who are past the beginner phase but not yet ready for full ECN exposure. STP platforms offer cleaner execution than basic brokers without introducing the technical layers associated with institutional trading tools.

STP brokers are popular among traders who are transitioning from MM/DD broker environments toward more serious trading, but whose trading strategies are not demanding enough to justify ECN access.

When STP is Not A Good Fit

Highly technical traders, such as those using order flow analysis, liquidity pool tracking, or advanced arbitrage systems, may find STP environments lacking, and prefer ECN brokers or DMA. The absence of full market depth, limited pricing transparency, and reliance on broker-selected liquidity providers can limit strategic options. For these traders, ECN brokers, or even direct market access (DMA), is a better fit.

On the other end of the spectrum, we find beginners and small-scale hobby investors for whom picking an STP broker over an MM/DD broker would bring more complications than benefits. If you are trading infrequently or small trade sizes, fixed spreads from a reliable market maker might offer more simplicity and be worth the trade-offs, all things considered. Among other things, it is much easier to find MM/DD brokers that accept small deposits and nano or micro trade sizes.

ECN, SPT, and MM/DD Brokers – A Quick Comparison

A beginner entering the world of online trading will typically sing up with a market maker broker where orders are sent to the broker´s dealer desk. As traders become more advanced, some of them develop strategies that warrant an STP broker or ECN broker instead. Still, if you are so inclined, you can start with an STP broker or ECN broker right off the bat. Just be aware that they tend to be less beginner-friendly and many of them do not cater to nano and micro traders.

The STP model shares some characteristics with the ECN model, but also diverges in important ways. Both fall under the umbrella of non-dealing desk brokers and avoid taking positions against their clients. Both seek to minimize conflict of interest and maximize transparency in trade execution. However, STP brokers operate through a simplified routing mechanism and do not aggregate prices from multiple participants in a visible order book.

Market makers (MM/DD brokers), by contrast, carry out internal execution and can offer fixed spreads. This can sometimes result in faster order fills under certain conditions, but also introduces the risk of re-quotes, slippage, and potential conflicts of interest, especially when client and broker incentives are misaligned. While some market makers are well-regulated and provide competitive pricing, the perception of biased execution still leads many traders toward STP or ECN models.

Below, you will find a brief comparison of what to expect from MM brokers, STP brokers, and ECN brokers. It is just a general overview of how it usually is. There are brokers who do not conform to this, e.g. MM brokers who require a high first deposit. It is important that you research the individual brokers and account types that you are interested in.

Market Maker Broker (MM/DD broker)

This type of broker is a market maker and your orders will go to the broker´s in-house dealing desk. Your broker can be your counterpart in the trade, which creates a conflict of interest, since your broker earn money when you lose, and lose money when you profit.

Spreads can be fixed or variable, and you can expect them to be wider than with ECN brokers and STP brokers, especially if the MM/DD broker is offering commission-free trading. Many MM/DD brokers offer commission-free trading, and will earn the bulk of their money from the spreads.

Execution speed is normally fast with an MM/DD broker, but delays and requotes can be a probablem during certain circumstances. Even though it might seem contradictory (since your broker is your counterpart), slippage/requotes are actually more common with MM/DD brokers than with ECN brokers and STP brokers.

Transparency is lower with an MM/DD broker, since they are in charge of both pricing and being your counterpart in the trade.

MM/DD brokers are usually the broker-type of choice for beginner traders, especially nano and micro trader who need access to nano or micro sized trades, and want to make small deposits. There are many MM/DD brokers available where the minimum deposit is in the $10-$100 range, which is unusual for STP and ECN brokers. Some traders stay with MM/DD brokers throughout their trading life, while others move on other broker types as their strategies develop and their account balance grows.

STP Broker

STP is short for Straight Through Processing, and that is what will happen to your orders – they are processed straight to third-party liquidity providers. Your broker is not your counterpart in the trade, so you do no have to worry about that conflict of interest.

Unlike the ECN broker, the STP broker does not offer raw spreads. The spreads are usually a bit wider with and STP broker, due to a mark-up, but still tighter than with an MM/DD broker offering commission-free trading. Some STP brokers make the bulk of their money from marked up spreads, while others keep the spread mark-up smaller and charge a commission. It is important to research exactly what the STP broker you are interested in will do and how it will impact your particular trading strategy.

Execution speed is normally fast. Slippage/requotes are usually not common with STP brokers.

Transparency is higher than with an MM/DD broker, but lower than with a raw spread ECN broker.

You can expect standard trade sizes and a minimum deposit of at least a few hundred dollars. STP brokers are popular among intermediate and advanced traders.

ECN Broker

The ECN broker will match your orders with other traders or liquidity providers in an electronic communications network, and is not your counterpart in the trades.

ECN brokers normally offer raw spreads and charge a commission on both entry and exit. ECN brokers can be worth it when your strategy rely on even tighter spreads than what an STP broker will offer.

Execution is normally fast, but will depend on external liquidity. Slippage/requotes are possible, but rare in deep liquidity.

Transparency is higher than for both MM/DD brokers and STP brokers. Many ECN brokers will let you access Level II market information.

You can expect standard trade sizes and a minimum deposit of at least $500 to $1,000. STP brokers are popular among advanced traders who employ a strategy where paying commission makes sense in exchange for raw spreads and deep market data access.

How to Choose the Right STP Broker for Your Needs

Choosing an STP broker isn’t just about spreads or platform design, it’s about understanding the infrastructure behind how trades are executed and whether that setup truly fits the way you trade. While the term “STP” suggests a clean and automated process, not all brokers operate with the same level of transparency, efficiency, or reliability. The wrong STP broker can be just as damaging as a poorly regulated market maker, especially if they misrepresent how orders are routed or if their liquidity relationships are thin or outdated. The decision to go with an STP broker should be based on a mix of factors, including technical requirements, trading costs, operational structure, regulation, and trustworthiness.

Below, we will take a look at a few points that are important to keep in mind when you compare STP brokers.

Actual Execution Model

Just because a broker says “STP” doesn’t mean your trades are automatically routed to high-quality liquidity providers. Some brokers operate a hybrid model, combining STP-like routing with internal order handling, and exactly how it is done can be very opaque and confusing. Some hybrid brokers will only use their own dealing desk for certain order types or trade sizes, whiles others take a more complex approach to the selection. Before you pick a broker, you want to understand if the broker never internalizes your orders, if orders are internalized according to strict rules, or whether there’s some degree of discretion over how orders are routed.

Ask for details on order routing:

• Is this pure STP or hybrid? Does the broker take the other side of trades under certain conditions?
• Are trades sent directly to third-party liquidity providers without broker-side filtering or batching?
• Are there any manual review, price buffering, or order delays during execution?

Liquidity Provider Depth

STP brokers rely on their relationships with liquidity providers. If those providers are few in number, or thin in volume, your trade execution can suffer, especially during periods of high volatility or low market activity. Brokers with deep liquidity pools are better able to fill trades quickly, reduce slippage, and provide tighter spreads. The broader the liquidity access, the more reliable the pricing. Don’t settle for vague marketing claims. A reputable broker should be able to explain how many liquidity providers they work with, how they manage aggregation, and how they select the best bid and ask for each trade.

Spread Markup and Pricing Transparency

STP brokers earn money either by marking up the spread, charging a commission, or both. You’ll often see raw interbank spreads that are then widened slightly by the broker to include their fee. What’s important is knowing where that markup starts and ends.

Some STP brokers bury the markup in variable spreads and advertise “no commission,” which can sound appealing but actually be more expensive. Others add both a commission and a markup without clearly stating the breakdown. If possible, go with an STP broker that offers clarity instead.

• How is the mark-up added to raw spreads?
• Are commissions flat per lot or variable by trade size or volume?
• Do fees scale as volume increases, or is pricing static?

The goal is to understand your real cost per trade, not just what’s boldly printed in advertising material and which might only be true under certain circumstances.

Platform Integration and Order Handling

Execution speed depends on how well the STP broker’s back-end systems are integrated with the trading platform you’re using. Many STP brokers operate through MetaTrader 4 or MT5, platforms that support fast execution. Still, even with a great platform, broker-side slowness or bad bridge setups can introduce delays or slippage. If you’re using automated trading systems or complex order types, small inefficiencies in routing can have a big impact over time.

• Is the order routing engine native to the trading platform, or is it bridged through third-party software?
• Does the broker support fast order execution and low latency infrastructure?
• Is VPS or server co-location available for automated or high-frequency trading?

Order Size Flexibility and Fill Quality

You already know that most STP brokers do not offer nano and micro lots, but really large trade sizes can also be a problem. Not all STP brokers can reliably handle large trade sizes and this need to be taken into account when you look for a suitable STP for your strategy. If you routinely trade larger volumes or expect to scale positions aggressively, fill quality becomes crucial.

Some liquidity providers have limited depth or set minimum/maximum thresholds for accepting orders, so the best STP brokers split large trades across multiple providers when needed and offer consistent execution even at scale. Poorly equipped brokers may fill only part of the order, reject it altogether, or introduce slippage by delaying routing.

If you’re trading more than just micro lots, test the broker’s execution or request data on average slippage, fill time, and partial order handling.

Regulation, Transparency, and Reputation

Picking an STP broker doesn’t mean much if the broker isn’t properly regulated. Among other things, a hybrid broker can pose as a pure STP broker without much consequences if there is no strict financial authority present in the background, supervising broker conduct and enforcing trader protection rules.

Regulatory oversight also ensures that the broker can’t operate as both judge and jury when it comes to dispute resolution, slippage claims, or questionable fills. It adds pressure to maintain client fund segregation and strong risk management systems.

Look for regulation in jurisdictions with a track record of trader protection enforcement and avoid brokers that have offshore licensing with minimal oversight.

The level of transparency, e.g. how trades are reported, how execution quality is monitored, and how client funds are handled, can also give you a clearer view of the broker’s trustworthiness.

Last but not least, it is a good idea to check a brokers reputation within trading communities online.

Support

Good STP brokers invest in competent, responsive support, including support staff that can handle issues concerning large-volume orders and complex automated systems. You might eventually experience a platform glitch, a rejected order, a data sync problem, or some other issue, and having access to staff who actually understand order routing and server behavior makes a real difference.

Evaluate support based on factors such as:

• Response time during trading hours. Ideally, pick an STP broker that offers 24/5 or 24/7 human support.
• Availability of skilled technical personnel versus generic support agents who simply read from a script.
• Resolution policies for execution-related complaints.
• How you can reach the support. Live chat, phone, and email are common methods. If only email support is available, you will not be able to get step-by-step help in real-time to guide you through a problem.

A broker that claims STP execution but employ support staff that can’t explain how an order was routed should raise red flags.

FAQ